Monday, March 1, 2010

Week-10 Presentations - Plan

In the last class each group/individual will have prepared a presentation on their term projectusing PowerPoint.  These presentations will be no more than eight minutes long  and will have been submitted to VistaBB in advance.

Each topic-group will bring five copies of their PowerPoint slides (4 or six per page is economical) to share with the rest of their class group.

Because there are twenty five groups we cannot hear all of them.  The process we’ll follow, therefore, is to initially split into six class groups as assigned in this link to a Google Document.

The role of these class groups is to:

  • Review the slides and hear a brief description from the others in their group.
  • Decide which of them will present to the whole class – for an extra-credit point.
  • Be prepared to tell the class about other interesting things they learned in the discussion.

The balance of the class will be devoted to the the six presentations by the chosen individuals/groups.

  • Eight minutes long
  • Five minutes of discussion after the presentation

Friday, February 26, 2010

Sensors Assignment Observations – A2b

Most of you did quite well on the second portion of this database assignment although there was some confusion about what I meant by “comments”.  Here are some observations.

Comments Desired

I asked for comments in two criteria of the grading form.  I was asking you to think about the sensors.  Here are the criteria and what I was looking for.  The comments could be in comment fields, but it was certainly easier to put them in a separate document as many of you did.

  • Building Systems asked for “comments on the similarities and differences”  For this I expected you to identify similarities and differences between the sensors for different building systems.  These might include comments on:  size, frequency, cost, life span, sensitivity…..
  • Characteristics asked for “comments and tolerances”.  I was hoping for comments on the characteristics of the sensors including your own observations such as whether these made sense to you.  I gave liberal credit here for “tolerance” info and manufacturer’s info, but was hoping for more.
  • Overall asked for “Exceptional work with great thought”.  To get full credit here you needed to explain your thought process and any conclusions you reached about the assignment as a whole.

MS Access Comments

So long as you had a working database you got almost all credit.  To get credit for “Explores capabilities of database including reporting and formatting” you had to demonstrate going beyond what I created in the demo videos.

I offer the following observations about using Access itself:

  • A number of you created relationship links that would cause difficulties in practice.  That’s not suprising when getting started and I didn’t deduct for it.
  • The “measurements” table in my video is an example of a ‘trick’ often used in DB design.  If you have (in our world) a bunch of physical things that you want to use together it’s often best to create a new table (measurements in my case) that is an abstract thing that relates to the physical things you’re interested in.
  • In real situations you may often want to use one table in multiple relationships.  Access handles that best by creating multiple “instances” of that table.  If you’re interested I can explain it further.
  • A nice technique for documenting a table (or writing general comments) is to create a “Documentation” table that isn’t linked to others and has fields for writing comments.

Jim Mitchell

Friday, February 19, 2010

MS Access Assignment - A2a

Most of you completed this assignment with few or no problems so there should be  a great deal to say.  However:

Next Assignment

  • A reminder that for A2b I expecting you to use real sensors that you’ll research using catalogues or other sources.  It’s OK if not every field has data – that will show how hard it can be to truly characterize a sensor from the published information.

This Assignment

  • Some of you deleted a record in a table and then added it back, expecting to be able to assign the old ID number.  That doesn’t work:  When Access says “unique” it means unique for all time for a given table.  It actually is a “feature not a bug.”  If you were able to create an ID that had already been used you might inadvertently link to records you hadn’t intended in other tables.  It does show that you want to be careful deleting records – the general rule is: Don’t.  Most database designers hide the ID and key from users to avoid this confusion.
  • Some of you wondered why have forms rather than just enter info into queries or tables.  The answer is that you can make forms very “pretty” and can also associate “logic” with them to do interesting things.
  • A few of you struck out on your own rather than following the videos exactly.  Congratulations!  Unfortunately that exposed you to the more complex side of Access such as multiple versions of a table being linked – that can be very helpful, but it’s quite confusing.
  • Finally, only one person reported playing with the templates.  I recommend it.  Some of them are extremely well developed.  You may find them hard to understand initially since they use lots of features we haven’t touched, but they do neat things and can be modified to suit your needs much more rapidly than starting from scratch.

Jim Mitchell

Paper Drafts – Some Overall Comments

I’ve just completed reviewing all the paper drafts and returning them with comments.  Most of you selected interesting topics and pursued them well – the overall quality was good.  There are, however, some issues that are worth addressing

  • A few of you were under the required length – not many.  Be sure not to try and “pad” the length with extensive quotes.  They don’t count.
  • A few of you attempted ambitious projects involving programming Revit or something similar.   In those cases I suggested deciding on fall-back strategies of how to complete the paper if the project couldn’t be carried to completion.
  • As always, citing literature sources is important at the point you use it, not just at the end of the paper.  I fed several documents through the TurnItIn process to check that there weren’t problems and indeed found one (fairly minor).  I will do so again with the final draft.
  • Creating subdivisions (sub-headings) of the paper can be very helpful both to the reader and the author.  They usually mark a major change of thought.
  • In several cases there did not seem to be an overall objective for the paper, a “question” or “thesis” that was being addressed.  Just providing a summary of other people’s work isn’t enough.
  • Please note that I did my best to be lenient and evaluate where you were “going” with the paper rather than look at it as a finished document.  I will be significantly tougher when looking at the final draft, applying the grading criteria firmly.

Jim Mitchell

Thursday, February 11, 2010

New Services with BIM

One of the discussions this week asked your ideas about possible new services that could be offered using BIM.  Many of you chose to talk about improvements in existing services rather than possible new services – things for which someone would pay extra.

That inspired me to come up with my own list.  I offer the following link as a discussion point.  It is not exhaustive and certainly a number of my suggestions are debatable as to practicality and/or who would either offer or buy them.  Nonetheless I suggest that there are many possibilities.

New Services Possible Using BIM capabilities through the building life cycle

If any of you would like to add to this list or modify it just contact me and I’ll give you editing privileges.

Jim Mitchell

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Week-6 Discussion – BIM Wrapup

This week’s posts, the majority of which I highly recommend to you, are an excellent wrap-up for our study of BIM in the first half of this course. Most of you agree that it is going to have a major effect on the construction world with specific changes including:

  • Further globalization of design & fabrication of building components - as in the aircraft and auto industries
  • Restructuring of the design and construction process and the relationships between the players in that process
  • Increased demand for skilled professionals - you
  • Decreased demand for unskilled professionals - with unemployment consequences
  • Ever increasing demands on hardware, software & internet communication
  • Opportunities for new services
    • I was surprised that none of you considered the possibility of designers and contractors extending their services through the life of the building by use of the BIM tool. I can see many opportunities there.

Some of you recognized that not every technical improvement (BIM in this case) comes to pass or is as splendid as the enthusiasts forecast. Concerns you expressed included:

  • BIM adoption is slower than Eastman et. al. claims
  • Humans operate these systems and still make mistakes or are dishonest
  • The technical challenges of interoperability, file size, etc. are major are significant
  • The book doesn't address legal and liability issues - ones that are often extremely important
  • The consequences of changes in the system may produce socioeconomic effects that we regret - unemployment being the most obvious one

Jim Mitchell

Missed Lecture 2/10/2010 - Videos

Thanks to our second snowstorm of the past few days you’re all enjoying a day without Drexel.  In order to make up for the missed classtime I’ve made a series of eight videos that contain most of the material I intended to cover today.  They’re in the same “playlist” as the MS Access Demo that was announced in the previous blog entry.

Today’s Videos are:

Number Title Length
1 Intro 10:17
2 BIM Wrapup 8:45
3 Data Overview 7:43
4 Database Example - Amazon 8:25
5 Databases – Why we use them 13:22
6 DBMS & Terminology 8:25
7 Relational Database Concepts 11:30
8 Homework A2 Comments 6:08
  Entire Playlist Including Demo of creating Database  

Jim Mitchell